Uhm, is this really necessary? We will never cleanup sandbox if we wait for OK from anybody who ever comitted anything. After all, it's only sandbox, and the proposal is to move things around, not to remove or change in unobvious ways.
Maybe it is possible and polite to check at least the authors which recently (f.e. last month) committed something.
So, can we just agree on layout, and then I can do "svn mv" as necessary?
In fact, it's probably easier than I though. We have both /sandbox and /sandbox-branches. So, how about this:
1. Declare that /sandbox should follow<library>/{boost,libs} layout. 2. Move everything else into /sandbox-branches
Boost.Geometry follows <library>/{boost,libs,other} layout where other contains small programs not fitting within libs. I hope this is permitted. I'm quite dependent on the current place and so are many users. I will remove the (now obsolete) ggl folder which is still there. Maybe it is also possible (now or in the future) to make a distinction between already-accepted-but-not-yet-incorparted libraries (such as Boost.Geometry) and proposed libraries. Finally there is also /sandbox-tags, of which the structure is also not so clear to me. I've taken the freedom to create a "geometry" folder there, and below that are our tags. So the there structure is for me: /sandbox-tags/<library>/<tagname>/{boost,libs} And I propose that as a convenient layout. Regards, Barend