Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?

1 Apr 2010

      AMDG

Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10 wrote:
...
Honestly the MSVC bug just made me more aware that copy-constructors 
and non-copy-constructors can get confused, in a generic context. But 
the example I added to the ticket (#3472) would also be ambiguous on 
other compilers, when value_initialized(T const&) would be added:
class my_integer
 {
   value_initialized<int> m_data;
 public:
   operator value_initialized<int>() const;
   operator int() const;
 };
int main()
 {
   my_integer my;
   value_initialized<int> val(my);
 }
See http://codepad.org/zukxSDbB
Um.  Why do you /want/ to do this?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe