Re: [boost] Two alined_storage classes in the CVS

In my opinion, the older version needs to be removed entirely and the libraries should be updated to use the TR1 version of aligned_storage.

I wondered about that as well, in fact I started testing a possible fix, only to realise half way through that it's more or less trivial to patch the "old" aligned_storage to make it conform to the TR (just needs a ::type typedef member), I'm testing that now, but expect to see the new version disappear from cvs shortly. John.