John Maddock wrote:
Jeff Garland wrote:
Marcin Kalicinski wrote:
I agree it might be beneficial to put the library in the CVS, even though the docs are not up to date yet. But I don't yet have access to the main CVS, so how should we handle that?
Please send your sourceforge id to the moderator list boost-owner@lists.boost.org and one of us will add you in.
Before we get too far on: only reviewed and *accepted* libraries should be in Boost cvs. Work in progress should go in the sandbox: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost-sandbox/
Or have I misunderstood the intent here? It happens often :-)
Property Tree was accepted....somehow that didn't make the News on the front page, but it was recorded here: http://lists.boost.org/boost-announce/2006/05/0092.php Jeff