5 Jun
2006
5 Jun
'06
12:56 p.m.
On 6/5/06, Alec Ross <alec@arlross.demon.co.uk> wrote:
- Integer - Unbounded Integer // a poor second, for me
Integer might be nice, but we already have a Boost.Integer, and I'm not sure that an "infinite precision integer" belongs in that library. I think that unbounded is the nicest alternative so far. What about generalizing the library name to Boost.Unbounded and possibly (later) including a floating-point type with unbounded range and precision? ~ Scott