Re: [boost] [Boost] Compile-time power of a run-time base

AMDG John Maddock wrote:

I'm a bit concerned about this interface: my guess is that 90% or more of users would just want integer exponents, and these should be very easy to use, preferably simply:

pow<2>(val)

Hmmm, I wonder if we can define an overload such that:

pow<2,3>(val)

is also valid?

Regards, John.

Ok. How about: template<class N, class T> ... pow(T t); template<int N, class T> ... pow(T t) { return(pow<mpl::int_<N> >(t)); } In Christ, Steven Watanabe