Vladimir Prus wrote:
Folks, I would have like to merge Boost.Build state from trunk to release branch. This matter was discussed briefly in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/180814/
but it didi not lead anywhere, and further it seems to be some confusion between merging Boost.Jam (which Rene wants) and merging Boost.Build.
To reiterate, I think Boost.Build should be merged because:
- it now supports linux->windows cross compile - it allows to eliminate configuration warning messages from libraries that are not built (which requires corresponding merges for libraries Jamfiles, but it's trivial) - it fixes a bug where include=/foo/bar could not be specified on the command line - it has some other smaller fixes - I don't see any breakage on trunk tests
Comments?
So, what is the final conclusion? Rene and Eric agree to merge, but I don't quite understand to gets to say final "yes". Thanks, Volodya