17 Sep
2006
17 Sep
'06
1:08 a.m.
Am Samstag, den 16.09.2006, 19:55 +0200 schrieb loufoque:
Aristid Breitkreuz wrote : [snip]
That's fine. Do you have plans on which Unicode encoding to use internally?
UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32 would all be available for implementations, and each one would be able to take or give the other ones for input/output.
I guess that every single supported type is extra complexity, right? Would not UTF-8 (for brevity and compatibility) and UTF-32 (because it might be better for some algorithms) suffice?