18 Oct
2021
18 Oct
'21
3:31 a.m.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 7:22 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
If we want Boost to stay in the game, it has to adapt its offering to be more friendly and seamless with std library vocabulary types. Peter has already done much of this work, making boost::error_code seamlessly interoperable with std::error_code (thanks for that!).
Should boost::shared_ptr be seamlessly interoperable with std::shared_ptr? Why (or why not)?