Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
a) boost::throw_exception would be deprecated. (not changed)
I'm yet to see a problem identified with boost::throw_exception, in terms of anything at all -- speed, space, build times, whatever.
lol
Removing functionality from a function breaks code. What is the pain you want to alleviate, that justifies deprecation?
the pain would be miniscule. it would result in a trivial compile error which would take only a couple of minutes to fix. To me this is a small price to pay to address that the problem with gratuitous dependency extension. I realize you (and others) don't see this is a problem - we just have to agree to disagree on this. Robert Ramey
Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost