Hi there, 2014-03-12 1:19 GMT+08:00 TONGARI J <tongari95@gmail.com>:
Hi Steven,
2014-03-12 0:45 GMT+08:00 Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com>:
AMDG
On 03/11/2014 09:22 AM, TONGARI J wrote:
Hi folks,
I know it'd be better to say "overload", but I choose the word carefully because I'm aware of Boost.OverloadedFunction, which is not what I'm talking here (it's complementary, though).
What I want is to have std/boost::function support multi-signature itself, instead of relying on some external wrapper which is less efficient. For example:
http://www.boost.org/doc/html/boost_typeerasure/examples.html#boost_typeeras...
Thanks for the example, seems fairly easy with Boost.TypeErasure, then I'd like to compare the performance :)
For anyone interested, I wrote a benchmark: https://github.com/jamboree/CxxFunctionBenchmark The usage is degenerated to single signature to compare with other function implementations. You could see the sample result on the page.