On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 03:20:13PM +0200, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
Le mar 28/09/2004 ? 14:18, Aleksey Gurtovoy a ?crit :
Guillaume Melquiond writes:
Le dim 26/09/2004 ? 09:40, Aleksey Gurtovoy a ?crit :
Hmm, it looks like GCC 2.95.3/STLPort didn't get covered by the patch -- http://tinyurl.com/6e3g5. Is this something we can fix easily?
I have committed a small patch. Let's see if it fixes things. I can't be sure it will work since my version of STL is 4.6 and I don't have these problems.
It did! Once again, thanks everybody!
I'm surprised it worked that well. Except for the last one, all the tests now pass. They shouldn't, since a deficiency with respect to name resolution should prevent some cmp*.cpp tests from passing (as can be seen with gcc-2.95.3-linux report). Martin, is the compiler really GCC 2.95 for the STLport tests?
As for the last test (test_float), it seems the compiler does not find the abs(float) and abs(double) functions. The compilation warning shows only abs(int) is defined.
I guess the problem lies in the current test code: #ifndef BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE using std::abs; #endif
Hmm, this might be due to the fact that <math.h> on linux doesn't include the C++-specific overloads for abs(). If STLPort's <cmath> includes <math.h> (not a <cmath> from e.g. libstdc++) then it won't get the abs() overloads. libstdc++ suffers from the same problem, if you include <math.h> not <cmath> then you don't get the C++-specific parts, only those parts that are part of C89. For STLPort the problem may be compounded because even <cmath> may not add the extra overloads if all it does is forward to the system's <math.h> (which I _think_ is the case if there's no <cmath> installed on the system, or it's not visible to STLPort). jon -- "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds..." - Ralph Waldo Emerson