Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
At Sunday 2005-02-06 04:45, you wrote: [...] It's becoming apparent that the ONLY possibilities being considered are CVS (ancient history) and Subversion. Other than my mention of cvsnt and one other NOBODY is looking at it.
not to put _too_ fine a point on it:
CVSNT ELIMINATES THIS PROBLEM!!
Well, we have to look at TCO. Does CVSNT offer *other* compelling advantages over CVS *and* SVN? Because if it can't offer the other nice features of SVN, we have to weigh whether we want to switch to a one-trick pony or not. The impression I get from a quick glance is that CVSNT is just a tweaked CVS that adds a few things like smart merge and authentication. But Boost doesn't exactly have highly sensitive projects that require fine-grained security control, so it seems that it should be more concerned with the types of common user tasks that SVN does well in comparison to CVS. However, I am more than willing to be convinced otherwise, given additional information. Dave