David Abrahams wrote:
template< class Fun > struct indirect_fun { indirect_fun( Fun f ) : fun(f) { }
template< class T > typename result_of<Fun(typename pointee<T>::type)>::type operator()( T const& r ) const { return fun( *r ); }
template< class T, class U > typename result_of< Fun( typename pointee<T>::type, typename pointee<U>::type, )>::type operator( T const& r, U const& r2 ) const { return fun( *r, *r2 ); }
// etc private: Fun fun; };
Now, what exactly is better about this template over the one I posted? Sorry for my ignorance, but I just don't get the point. For example, it looks like this template doesn't handle the reference-to-reference problem. And what is pointee<T>? Is this a boost template? Regards, Matthias Kaeppler