24 Aug
2020
24 Aug
'20
7:47 p.m.
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 22:40, Zach Laine via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
It doesn't matter how likely it is. This isn't just about us, but also about our users.
One other option would be to ask Unicode Inc. for a permission to use Unicode data in binary form without the requirement to present the license.
Why is this suddenly a problem if Boost.Spirit has been doing it for years?
IANAL and all that, but I don't think that argument works very well. In the case of a hypothetical copyright violation, I have never heard anything suggesting that the length of a period of violation somehow renders the copyright moot, nor is there any suggestion that not coming after a violation does so either.