On 04/27/2005 12:40 PM, Giovanni P. Deretta wrote: Giovanni, I guess this was an "OOPS" since there was nothing added. Anyway, I should say, w.r.t. redundancy, that the following code: enum_map<0>::field_names const index=enum_map<0>::f_0; from the vault file mentioned here:
Larry Evans wrote: [snip]
http://boost-sandbox.sourceforge.net/vault/index.php?&direction=0&order=&directory=cppljevans
does contain some redundancy since the field_name, f_0, has to be qualified with the struct, enum_map<0>, where it's defined. Also, in enum_map, there's redundancy in that the enumeration has to be defined first before it's used in the mpl::map. This is in contrast to the corresponding struct: struct enum_map_0 { type_i<0> f_0; type_i<1> f_1; type_i<2> f_2; }; where the field names only occur once.