Re: [boost] [preprocessor] use case: named parameters for macros

Aristid Breitkreuz wrote:

I would be glad to see the improvements you or anybody wishes to make. Of course you don't _need_ to show them.

Just implemented tranformation of the previous argument value for the same parameter to e.g. allow certain parameters to be specified multiple times to form a sequential data structure. I got away with a single fold plus the "tupleizing" step for the binary sequence. The code's in the vault: http://tinyurl.com/yk8z3u

PS: Wondering whether I should propose that for Boost.

I'd sure welcome such a utility header! However, it could be a good idea to start a new thread with an explicit question in the subject to find out whether there are more people interested. Regards, Tobias