David Abrahams ha escrito:
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
I've noticed entries do not follow any definite order. Print publications are more or less sorted by year, but other sections are seemingly listed
at random.
I propose the following:
* Inside each section, sort lexicographically by year and author, for instance online mentions would get like this
[Burnap02] [Curran02] [Siek02b] [Casad03] [Lischner03] [Stein04]
I think it will be easier for people to find things if it's sorted by author and year instead.
Well, my rationale is that older entries tend to get obsolete, so the reader can concentrate on the fresher entries at the end of each section. But I can apply whatever policy we agree to adhere to.
[Burnap02] [Casad03] [Curran02] [Lischner03] [Siek02b] [Stein04]
I guess if you leave a blank line between years it might help.
?? Isn't this last suggestion contradictory with having the entries sorted first by author? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo