Antony Polukhin wrote:
Current implementation of recursive_wrapper move constructor is not optimal:
recursive_wrapper<T>::recursive_wrapper(recursive_wrapper&& operand) : p_(new T(std::move(operand.get()) )) { }
During descussion were made following proposals:
<snip>
Please, vote for solution or propose a better one.
A very good post and interesting discussion. But one small sticking point in my opinion. I would prefer that the word "vote" be replaced with "make recommendation". The word "vote" suggests that all input will be weighted equally. Our traditional reviewing process recognises that all input is not equal and assigns to one person - review manager - the role of weighing all the input. In some cases the review manager may (and I assume has) over-ruled the majority because the arguments of the minority were better in his view. So I would have preferred that the the post used the phrase "Please submit recommendation on design" rather than "Please vote for behavior" Robert Ramey