Pavel Chikulaev wrote:
"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> wrote in message news:d0rs1h$22j$1@sea.gmane.org...
is_same< function_type_parameters< void(int,float) >::signal_type, signal2<void, int, float>
It is possible already:
No. You can unpack arguments, but you can't choose signal2 or signal3 and so on.
You're right - unpack_args won't help, here. OK, then let's say: signal< function_type<plain_function,Seq>::type >
IIRC there is no version of signal taking an MPL-Sequence. 'signal<my_function>' should work, though.
I meant a bit another thing.
//From your examples: typedef void my_function(int);
typedef function_type_signature<my_function> my_signature;
typedef mpl::push_back<my_signature,float>::type my_modified_signature;
boost::signal<my_modified_signature::representee>. == boost::signal<void (int, float)> ^^^ This is invalid code and not part of my example (can't compare types with '==').
//You can't do the same for signalN!!!!!
I already explained why, in my previous post! Regards, Tobias