On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
on Thu Dec 15 2011, Olaf van der Spek <ml-AT-vdspek.org> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
on Thu Dec 15 2011, Olaf van der Spek <ml-AT-vdspek.org> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Olaf van der Spek <ml@vdspek.org> wrote:
Are there any plans to propose Boost Iterator for TR2?
Dave?
I have no plans, and it really wouldn't be appropriate in its current form. It needs a thorough going-over and probably a few design changes before it would be ready for another attempt at standardization. The standards proposals were determined to be not fully-baked enough when we submitted them the last time.
What about it? I don't see its relevance to TR2
The original idea was to request size_type to be added to iterator_traits. It'd properly solve the iterator_range::size() return type issue. Beman and Daniel said iterator_traits is considered less than ideal and suggested boost/iterator/iterator_traits instead. Hence my request to you. -- Olaf