Re: [boost] [hash2][review] Early review (due to holidays)

based on a span-like concept. Hasher's update signature would remain as ( void const*, std::size_t ). Authors of hash algorithms would not need to include a span header or add additional signatures.

Am I missing something? Why would that be a benefit? Having safe interfaces is the whole point I was raising. A span header is not something onerous to include. Why should any hashing authors not be provided with friendly, safer interfaces? Claudio.