24 Oct
2006
24 Oct
'06
10:52 p.m.
Rene Rivera wrote:
Problem counts: 1419 files missing Boost license info or having wrong reference text
It seems the majority of these license problems come from documentation files, either html, or xml, css and xsl that genarate them. I understand the need for copyright, but don't understand why these files also need a license. If we intend to do something about this problem, we are still a LONG way from release. What are our release manager's feelings about this? Can we get away with adding another filter to the analysis utility? -- AlisdairM