[boost] Re: BOOST_TRY like macros: time to add them?

1 Mar 2004


      Le lun 01/03/2004 à 12:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
...
Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond@ens-lyon.fr> writes:
| With this new definition of the macros, it seems to me you can't use
| multiple catch (a handler sequence). But I don't see any way to define
| the macros such that BOOST_TRY {} BOOST_CATCH(_) {} BOOST_CATCH(_) {}
| works as expected. Adding a BOOST_TRY_END would solve the problem. But
| maybe someone can find a better solution without adding any macro.
Would something that resulted in:
if (true) {
} else if (false) {
} else if (false) {
}
No, you get the dangling-else problem back. It's why I was suggesting a
BOOST_TRY_END to correctly close the "if" (for example, "else {}")
...
work?
try {
} catch () {
} catch () {
}