At Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:42:01 +0000 (UTC), Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Jonathan Franklin <franklin.jonathan <at> gmail.com> writes:
I believe the key here is the lack of responsiveness by the maintainer.
We need to be careful, how we identify this lack of responsiveness. Maybe we should ask maintainer to acknowledge that he seen the ticket? The fact that ticket is not addressed is not an indicator that maintainer is not aware about it.
The system has an “accepted” state for tickets precisely so that a maintainer can note that he has it in his queue. This is the way it's /supposed/ to work (IMO): * Unreviewed tickets are assigned to the default maintainer, but not accepted or commented on by him * Reviewed tickets are either accepted or reassigned to someone else -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com