23 Oct
2013
23 Oct
'13
6:34 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Peter Dimov
Beman Dawes wrote:
Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for VC++ 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a problem specific workaround?
Get signals2 working, I'd say. The variadic constructor is already a bit broken in that it incorrectly accepts zero arguments, so why not just constrain it to two or more.
template
slot( A1 const& a1, A2 const& a2, Args const&... args ) { ... }
That sounds fine by me. I can commit the change to trunk tonight, should I also commit it to release, or wait for tests to cycle? -- Frank