11 Sep
2012
11 Sep
'12
7:51 a.m.
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 09:08:03 Oliver Kowalke wrote:
It is possible to implement it but I've concerns because the
coroutine-fn
has another signature/return type as the signature given to coroutine as template argument. It might confuse users.
typedef coroutine< int( int) > coro_t;
void fn( coro_t::self_t&, int) {...}
I don't follow the thread closely, but you could provide a placeholder type to indicate the self_t argument in the signature.
I mean the return type of coroutine-fn and the signature int htecoroutine template arg differ (beside the self_t argument).