Andreas Huber wrote:
Hi there
After the call for volunteers to clear the regression failures (can't help with those, currently no access to the relevant platforms), I think it's also time to get busy with the remaining inspection failures: - The *X* report doesn't look too bad, all of the few remaining problems seem to be in libraries that are currently actively maintained. - The *LC* report however does not look good at all. There are a large number of problems and some of them are in public areas (e.g. people) or not actively maintained libs (e.g. pool).
What should we do about the *LC* problems? Is it worth bothering with those?
Um, don't know, in theory yes, but there are a lot truly trivial issues showing up, for example there are dozens of html redirect files, that have no content except a http-refresh redirection, we could just mark these so they don't show up in the report I guess? I'm more concerned about all the broken links reported in the X report, some of our documentation looks to be in a very poor state :-( If someone would like to look at this, and/or nag the authors concerned that would be great! John.