Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Folks,
If all the compilers that currently show up as uBLAS regressions on http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/summary.html are indeed not supported, could somebody please mark them up correspondingly in "status/explicit-failures-markup.xml" (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/status/explicit-failures-m...) ?
Thanks!
for test3 of ublas I would like to keep the remark of Stefan for intel-win32-8_1 and apply remark with 'refid = 30' of Michael Stevens for the two gcc-2.95's. Should I modify explicit-markup-failure.xml as below for doing that ? <test name="test3"> <mark-failure> <toolset name="intel-win32-8_1"/> <note author="S. Slapeta" refid="3"/> <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3-linux"/> <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.3-linux"/> <note author="M.Stevens" refid="6"/> </mark-failure> </test> Or should I use two <mark-failure> blocks or ...?