20 Jul
2010
20 Jul
'10
4:37 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> wrote:
For those reasons, Rene and I have decided that "bjam.exe" should go. We're thinking about naming the executable simply "build.exe", since no other build tool bothered to take it.
The name bjam is no doubt hard-coded in many build scripts and renaming it will create a lot of unnecessary bugs. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode