Re: [boost] Interfaces Library, a macro less implementation

Daniel Wallin wrote:

Joel de Guzman wrote:

...

Hi,

I like the idea behind the Interfaces Library: http://www.kangaroologic.com/interfaces/

I need one now. I dislike the macro-based Interface Definition Language, however. I find it utterly ugly especially because interfaces should be immediately readable. IMO, the macro-based IDL is not.

Have you seen the suggestions for a better macro IDL? For instance:

No.

BOOST_INTERFACE( baz, (int, foo, (int)) (int, bar, (char const*)) )

IMO that's quite readable.

Indeed. They're ok. Not as pretty as real C++ member functions, but ok. Is there a prototype? Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net