* Authors We Need For The BSL
"John R Bandela" is in blanket-permission.txt as "John Bandela". "Robert Ramey - http www rrsd com" is in blanket-permission.txt as "Robert Ramey". "Thorsten Ottosen" is in blanket-permission.txt as "Thorsten Jørgen Ottosen".
It should be really easy to take care of these aliases.
Done, I've added the Aliases to blanket-permission.txt, and fixed up the regex scanning to pick up on Robert Ramey's web address.
* See the "Old style Boost licence #8" - bcp is getting /terribly/ confused about the file boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_grammar.hpp .
Because it has *two* licences in it. Not much we can do about that.
* There are 86 files with no recognizable license information, and 247 with no recognizable copyright holder. The latter are all MPL though.
Yep, I wish we could handle those better, and it looks like we still need another push to get rid of those files with no license at all.
* The 20 files that have been automatically BSLed look good to me - no obvious munging, though I don't know if I should be looking for anything specific.
* There are still 641 files that have not been BSLed (I think this category is disjoint from no-license and no-copyright).
Compare this to the 4738 BSLed files! Whoo!
Is bcp being enhanced to annotate which Boost modules are entirely BSLed and which aren't yet? This could go in the Input Information section; each module could have a tag saying "Not BSLed", "BSLed, But Dependent On Modules Not BSLed", and "BSLed".
Also I don't know if my technique of getting bcp to report on all
Maybe, probably it would just have to be a Yes or no answer - bcp can't really tell which file "belongs" to whom. directory names in boost/libs is catching everything or not. I use "." as the module name, of course then it flags up a whole load of new problems :-( Thanks, John.