Helge Bahmann wrote:
Hello everyone
I have written a small library providing:
- a (thread-safe) signal/slot implementation - poll/timer/reactor implementation - atomic operations modelled after the proposed C++0x standard (x86 32/64 bit, ppc, alpha, more if someone donates hardware; fallback implementation using locks)
<snip>
If you are interested, I invite you to have a look at:
http://www.chaoticmind.net/~hcb/projects/libtscb
Maybe parts of the library might be interesting for Boost? In particular the atomic operations could be salvaged and provide a "transitional" implementation internal to boost as an interim solution until compiler vendors catch up with C++0x, and I would also like to propose the reactor as a higher-performance alternative to Boost.Asio (my signal/slot implementation lacks combiners and other features provided by Boost.Signals2).
Hi, I have added your library on the LibrariesUnderConstruction wiki page (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/LibrariesUnderConstruction#tscb). The link you done point to the documentation. Could you gibe a link to download the library? I think everyone is interested in having an implementation, even a partial one, of the standard atomic library. There are a lot of internal implementation on the Boost libraries (SmartPtr, Thread, Task between others), maybe you can federate this implementation. Concerning the Signal/Slot implementation it would be worthwhile to extract it in a separated one. If the performances you announce are correct, I think you will have a lot of people interested in. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Proposal-for-library-addition%3A-faster-signals-slots%... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.