
17 Jul
2009
17 Jul
'09
6:55 p.m.
AMDG Celtic Minstrel wrote:
Just wondering, why is it necessary to specialize member_pointer for member function types? After all, in a type "T Q::*" the T could be a function type "void(int)", which would make the full type "void(Q::*)(int)", right?
void (Q::*)(int) const is a legal type. void(int) const is not. In Christ, Steven Watanabe