9 Mar
2007
9 Mar
'07
3:05 p.m.
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
On 3/9/07, Jeff Garland <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> wrote:
Yes, but usually UDS (and pipes that are often implemented on top of them) are still faster. Also sometimes you do not have a choice of the transport (think X-Windows over UDS) because it is dictated by some protocol spec.
Ok. But, I guess I see adding pipe support to asio as a completely different project than providing support for cgi/fastcgi, etc. AFAIK TCP sockets is the only transport for FastCGI.
Also pipes support is useful if you want to participate in a shell pipeline.
Sure, but again it seems like a different project... Jeff