--- "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Markus_Sch�pflin <markus.schoepflin@epost.de> wrote:
Which switches do you want to add to the toolset?
-model ansi
Correction: the unresolved symbol errors disappear if I add -model ansi not only to the compilation command, but also the link command. My old bug report seems to have done something! Now testing everything we have which will take a while... Ralf
Almost everything works with -model ansi, with this one exception: % python boost/libs/python/test/polymorphism.py E.E... ====================================================================== ERROR: testReturnCpp (__main__.PolymorphTest) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/net/worm/scratch1/rwgk/dist/boost/libs/python/test/polymorphism.py", line 20, in testReturnCpp self.failUnlessEqual ('B::f()', a.f()) RuntimeError: unidentifiable C++ exception ====================================================================== ERROR: test_pure_virtual (__main__.PolymorphTest) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/net/worm/scratch1/rwgk/dist/boost/libs/python/test/polymorphism.py", line 58, in test_pure_virtual self.failUnlessEqual ('Q::f()', q.f()) RuntimeError: unidentifiable C++ exception ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 6 tests in 0.008s FAILED (errors=2) The same test works when compiled without the -model switch. However, I guess this could be fixed somehow, and -model ansi is the way to go if it makes other errors disappear. I.e. I think -model ansi should be default in the toolset. Ralf _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush