On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:14 AM, joel<joel.falcou@lri.fr> wrote:
OvermindDL1 wrote:
In D a template is !() unlike in C++ where it is <>. I personally like <> better since I am used to it, but !() is certainly easier to parse and is unambiguous... But yes, that regex is completely lowered to pure D code at compile time, ala Boost.Xpressive's static regex parser.
D really does mix in a lot of LISP's power into a C++ syntax (not all of LISP's power, but it gets *REALLY* close)
Same here, I'm really enticed to jump into the D bandwagon. Alas lack of proper std and industrial support makes it awkward for me to use :(
even more off topic: Andrei, anyway random dev. can particiapte to D's development ?
D has it own list, and D version 2.0 has been in development for like 3 years now, it basically took anything that was considered wrong in D1.0 and fixed it, it is not backwards compatible, yet another reason that helps its stability, but is a detriment to it actually being used...