Re: [boost] [unicode] Interest Check / Proof of Concept

James Porter wrote:

This is probably workable. Do you envision something like the following?

my_string.encode(source,utf8());

It would have the benefit of making the interface for ct_strings and rt_strings the same. For ct_strings, it would specialize on the type of the encoding parameter, and for rt_strings, it would wrap the encoding up in some object to give it virtual dispatch.

I read through this again, and it doesn't actually make sense. ct_strings would never need an encoding specified. Nevermind! - Jim