20 Aug
2008
20 Aug
'08
11:34 p.m.
Daniel James wrote:
This has come up before. It's actually a problem with the preprocessor library and gcc 4.4's preprocessor. I wrote about it here:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/07/139765.php
I was going to write to the gcc people about this, but never got round to it. If anyone else would like to take this on, that'd be very helpful as I'm quite busy with other things at the moment.
What one can do? AFAICT they're correct. Are you thinking to convince them to be intentionally non-conforming? -- Genny