On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 3:44:31 AM UTC-6, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 06/03/2016 06:16, paul Fultz a écrit :
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:50 PM, Steven Watanabe <
watan...@gmail.com javascript:> wrote:
AMDG On 03/05/2016 07:21 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: I want to start a new sub-thread about some of the concerns of Steven Watanabe about whether some of the contents of this library fits better in Boost.Config. In particular the file boost/fit/returns.hpp.
When I mentioned Boost.Config, I was talking about things like
#ifndef BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE #ifdef _MSC_VER #define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 1 #else #define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 0 #endif #endif This is can be configurable, whereas Boost.Config it is not. I'm not sure this is true.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_60_0/libs/config/doc/html/index.html#boost_c...
That doesn't seem easily configurable by the user. I think I would prefer to make it configurable by the library and use Boost.Config for the default value.