28 Apr
2005
28 Apr
'05
9:54 a.m.
It appears that aligned storage itself is not a POD, so the ::type is necessary.
I can't imagine what would necessitate making aligned_storage<T> not a POD. Can somebody please explain?
It has user defined constructors (to make it non-copyable), and private data. I don't know why it was done that way, I'm just trying to make sure that the ::type member is TR1 conforming. BTW using aligned_storage directly like that (not going through the ::type member), is and always has been, untested and undocumented. John.