11 May
2012
11 May
'12
4:13 p.m.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Vicente Botet <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Olaf van der Spek-3 wrote
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@> wrote:
As these come together quite often when we want to make a non copyable class the user can use instead
public: BOOST_NO_COPYABLE(CLASS)
Isn't it simpler to derive from boost::noncopyable?
Hi,
I want to avoid to derive from whatever class.
Why? -- Olaf