On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:56:34AM -0500, Arkadiy Vertleyb <vertleyb@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Vinzenz Feenstra" <evilissimo@web.de> wrote
Hmm would be that "in-memory db" serializable ??
It's not at the moment, but it should be trivial to implement once there is a need. Of course, individual fields need to be serializable, and this is the user's responsibility.
We had a naive serialization in place at some point, and then we removed it. If we do it again, it will most likely be done via the Boost Serialization library. I am still working on the B*-tree implementation. :) At the moment I am just very busy with other things. I found an aspect oriented tree library written by a boost user, which needs some polishing before it can be used. But its strict design rule, of implementing all features as tree/node/link/value/key - type mutators allows interesting modifications,
Regards Andreas Pokorny