Re: [boost] [move] [variant] Some problems with VC++10

On 08/08/2011 18:54, Antony Polukhin wrote:

Most generic way to get rid of such ambiguity, is to import std::move in namespace boost (if we have std::move).

Or to get MSVC to qualify std::move. I agree it might still be a good idea to reuse std::move if it's available. The problem is that we've got no configuration macro for this. Some compilers have rvalue references but may not have a standard library that contains std::move.