David Abrahams ha escrito:
Cromwell Enage <sponage@yahoo.com> writes:
--- David Abrahams wrote:
Which categories should it go in?
Try "Containers" and/or "Miscellaneous".
How does it fit in "containers?"
I'd vote for "Generic Programming"
I fail to see what Boost.Parameter has to do with generic programming.
and "Miscellaneous." I think we should have a "Functional Programming" category and it should go in there, too.
Again, I don't see how the lib is related to functional programming. To me, Boost.Parameter sports a special kind of syntactic sugar, so I'd add an "Idioms" (or something like that) category grouping: - parameter - base-from-member - utility - perhaps, compressed_pair Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
We have more components designed to operate on functions and function objects every day.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost