None of them seem to be defined. I have checked one by one using the header
files included in the fibonacci example and none of those macros seem to be
defined.
Is there a test or a "boost" way for me to confirm and to be sure that none
of those macros are defined?
On 31 March 2016 at 22:20, Oliver Kowalke
if one of the defect macros below seams to be defined - prevents including execution_context:
BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_DECLARATIONS BOOST_NO_CXX11_CONSTEXPR BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS BOOST_NO_CXX11_FINAL BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_TUPLE BOOST_NO_CXX11_NOEXCEPT BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNIFIED_INITIALISATION_SYNTAX BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES BOOST_NO_HDR_ATOMIC BOOST_NO_HDR_TUPLE
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Carlos Miguel Ferreira Researcher at Telecommunications Institute Aveiro - Portugal Work E-mail - cmf@av.it.pt Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf.pt@gmail.com LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira