Steven Watanabe <watanabesj <at> gmail.com> writes:
I. New testing tool BOOST_CHECKA
This tool is based on excellent idea from Kevlin Henney. I chose the name CHECKA for this tool due to the lack of better name, but I am open to suggestions.
BOOST_CHECK_EXPR? Ideally I'd like this to be called BOOST_CHECK, but I don't think that can be made perfectly backwards compatible.
Yep. There are few cases where BOOST_CHECKA can't handle what BOOST_CHECK can. I really would prefer name as short as possible. This is intended to be a primary testing tool from now on. And I am kind of stuck with triplets of WARN/CHECK/REQUIRE, so any name has to fit into this schema. I've considered: BOOST_UCHECK (U for universal) BOOST_CHECK_EX (EX for extended) BOOST_CHECK_ASSERTION too long? BOOST_CASSERT/BOOST_WASSERT/BOOST_RASSERT (W/C/R for warn check and require levels) Gennadiy