20 Jun
2006
20 Jun
'06
5:48 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval@yahoo.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case. What's nonconformant about these checked iterators (apart from the warnings, which are annoying, but not nonconformant)?
They don't meet the complexity requirements (big-O) for iterators.
I asked this question at the Microsoft forums and the answer was that release (checked) iterators are conformant, while debug iterators are not - http://tinyurl.com/jwgvv. I guess that if anyone thinks otherwise, MS people would be glad to here about it...