Re: [boost] bad_weak_ptr::what() and TR1 conformance

Peter, These is purely release related. I don't have an opinion on the issue itself. Peter Dimov wrote:

Currently the Boost.TR1 <memory> fails one conformance test, bad_weak_ptr::what() returns 'boost::bad_weak_ptr' and it should return 'tr1::bad_weak_ptr'.

Any violent objections against changing it to conform in HEAD?

Any ordinary objections against changing it in 1.34 as well?

If it's OK for head, it's OK for 1.34.0. Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org