David Abrahams wrote:
3. I'd just say "go ahead," but I know how these things work in companies. The question to the PR department triggers a discussion with the legal department and they both decide it would be safer for the company if their use of open source software were not publicized.
Which questions the whole idea of "Who's using Boost". Your goal should be to provide a testimonies of those who are *proud* users of Boost - only then you can publish the list and call it "Boost success stories". If you want to publish the info even *knowing* that this might not be intended from the point of view of any not-so-proud user, then your list stops to be a list of "success stories" anymore and becomes a nitpick list, which can be titled "Boost shame stories". Sorry, but I think you should slow down and reflect. Just my 0.05 Euro, feel free to ignore. -- Maciej Sobczak http://www.msobczak.com